$40–60/hr · Mercor · Part time, 35 hours a week
A Finance Program Coordinator manages rater workflows and quality standards for AI training data in finance domains.
What you would do
- Oversee day-to-day coordination between finance specialists and AI training data teams to close workflow gaps
- Design and maintain tracking systems and escalation procedures for finance evaluation tasks
- Monitor rater quality and throughput metrics, delivering written status summaries and improvement feedback
- Triage finance-specific technical questions, escalating ambiguous issues to subject matter experts
- Collaborate with program leads to ensure accuracy and consistency in finance-domain training datasets
Who they want
- 5-10 years of finance or finance operations experience with cross-functional project coordination
- Demonstrated experience managing contributor teams (analysts, raters, or reviewers) against deadlines and quality benchmarks
- Career progression showing growth from analyst-level roles to coordination or program management
- Ability to work 35+ hours per week on weekday schedules
- Strong written and verbal communication with excellent organizational and problem-solving abilities
What the interview asks about
1.Rater performance monitoring
Training data quality depends on identifying when contributors fall behind or produce inconsistent evaluations, requiring systems to catch performance drift early.
For example: “Your finance raters completed 80% of their weekly allocation by Wednesday, then 90% by Friday. How would you investigate whether this signals a pattern, and what would determine if you escalate to program leadership?”
2.Workflow design for domain tasks
Finance concepts are nuanced; evaluation instructions must be precise and reusable, so coordinators design processes that prevent confusion and rework.
For example: “A rater asks whether a corporate restructuring costs should be treated as capex or expense under different accounting standards. How would you document this question and decide whether to resolve it yourself or escalate?”
3.Cross-functional communication
Coordinators sit between raters asking questions and subject matter experts with limited time, so clarity prevents delays and ensures the right expert gets the right question.
For example: “Three finance raters flagged conflicting interpretations of revenue recognition criteria in the same week. What steps would you take to identify whether this is a documentation gap or a genuine technical issue?”
4.Status reporting clarity
Program leadership makes resourcing and schedule decisions based on coordinator reports, so written updates must isolate real blockers from noise.
For example: “You've tracked rater throughput data over two weeks and noticed metrics drop after new task instructions were released. What would you include in your written summary to help leadership decide on next steps?”
5.Deadline and quality coordination
Finance evaluations must balance speed and accuracy; coordinators reconcile rater capacity constraints with program quality requirements.
For example: “Program leads need finance training data completed in 6 weeks, but early rater trials show the task is more complex than estimated. How would you frame this constraint and propose solutions?”
6.Escalation judgment
Not every rater question justifies pulling in a busy subject matter expert; coordinators filter routine issues from ones that require expert intervention.
For example: “A rater asks about accounting treatment for a specific derivative instrument. What information would you gather before deciding to escalate to your subject matter expert?”
A task you may get
Given a sample of finance training tasks and rater feedback over two weeks, identify throughput trends, spot inconsistencies in rater answers, and draft a status report with recommended actions.
How to prepare
- Review finance domain concepts (revenue recognition, capital structures, accounting standards) so you understand technical depth of rater work
- Study project coordination frameworks (tracking systems, escalation criteria, workflow design) used in quality-heavy operations
- Practice analyzing performance data: spot trends, distinguish signal from noise, and write clear summaries for non-technical audiences
- Research how AI training programs structure rater tasks and ensure consistency across thousands of evaluations
The facts
- Pay
- $40–60/hr
- Hours
- Part time, 35 hours a week
- Where
- Remote · United States
- Open to
- USA
- Field
- Finance
- Posted
- 7/10/2026
- Places left
- 10
We wrote this page from the public Mercor listing. It may be out of date, so read the full posting before you apply.