$50–55/hr · Mercor · Hourly, 10 hours a week
A subject matter expert who validates AI work samples by auditing domain accuracy, task realism, and grading quality for a professional interview platform.
What you would do
- Review complete AI project attempts including task descriptions, agent outputs, supporting files, and automated scoring sheets
- Determine whether tasks represent genuine workplace scenarios or unrealistic simulations of public sector challenges
- Examine factual correctness, regulatory compliance, and adherence to field-specific standards in generated materials
- Compare automated grading decisions against your professional judgment using documented evidence
- Assign holistic performance bands that indicate whether practitioners could actually utilize the work product
Who they want
- Active or recent public sector professionals with 4+ years implementing, enforcing, or managing compliance, operations, or frontline supervision
- Experience authoring consequential documents like compliance findings, corrective action plans, incident reviews, or case management records
- Comfortable interpreting spreadsheets, PDFs, and structured data to verify numerical consistency and factual claims
- Advanced English proficiency sufficient to explain nuanced professional judgments in writing
- Availability for hourly contract work with approximately one hour per evaluation item
Main skills
What the interview asks about
1.Recognizing authentic versus manufactured scenarios
Interviewers need assurance you distinguish between plausible public sector situations and contrived problems reflecting insufficient field familiarity, because misleading practice materials waste candidate preparation time.
For example: “An AI-generated case describes a social worker completing an assessment in 20 minutes without required specialist consultations. How would you categorize the realism, and what regulatory element would a real practitioner immediately question?”
2.Detecting regulatory or factual inconsistencies
Only practitioners internalize the subtle details of licensing requirements, mandatory procedures, and agency policies that surface in high-stakes work, ensuring evaluation materials accurately reflect field constraints.
For example: “You find a compliance report citing a specific statutory requirement, but the citation format and referenced regulation year seem off. Walk through how you would verify accuracy and document your findings.”
3.Assessing grading methodologies against professional standards
Automated scoring systems may miss context-dependent judgments that separate competent work from substandard execution in your discipline, requiring practitioner validation.
For example: “The grading sheet says the output 'met requirements,' but you notice it lacks a critical procedural element or uses terminology incorrectly. How would you document the discrepancy and decide if the score stands?”
4.Assigning defensible performance classifications
Your judgment must reflect whether a peer in your role could accept or use the output under real pressures, establishing credibility for the grading rubric.
For example: “Looking at an AI-generated administrative plan with complete formatting, correct references, but a misapplied procedure in one section, what band would you assign and why might that differ from the automated score?”
5.Communicating critical analysis concisely
Interviewees rely on your written reasoning to understand gaps and refine their performance, so clarity, specificity, and focus on actionable observations matter as much as accuracy.
For example: “You strongly disagree with one of 11 grading answers. How would you structure your written explanation to support your position without simply restating the question?”
How to prepare
- Prepare a 2-3 page summary of your current role's main compliance obligations or operational procedures, and note which regulations or policies you reference most frequently
- Gather 3-5 examples of documents you have personally written (findings, plans, reviews) and be ready to discuss judgment calls you made in drafting them
- Outline the most common errors or shortcuts you see junior staff make in your role, and the consequences those mistakes create
The facts
- Pay
- $50–55/hr
- Hours
- Hourly, 10 hours a week
- Where
- Remote
- Open to
- USA
- Posted
- 9/3/2026
We wrote this page from the public Mercor listing. It may be out of date, so read the full posting before you apply.