$200/hr · Mercor · Hourly, 40 hours a week
An experienced physician-researcher who transforms healthcare market research requirements into clinically accurate and methodologically sound physician surveys.
What you would do
- Parse detailed research briefs identifying target cohorts, screening criteria, and key investigation topics for UC-focused studies
- Author survey questions addressing patient segmentation, disease severity classification, medication sequencing patterns, and therapy adoption factors
- Design response options, Likert scales, conditional branching, and screening logic aligned with clinical accuracy and research objectives
- Review drafted surveys for factual accuracy, question clarity, logical organization, response bias elimination, and completeness
- Package final deliverables matching provided templates and quality standards for direct client deployment
Who they want
- Licensed MD or DO with clinical background in gastroenterology or inflammatory bowel disease management, ideally with patient care experience
- Deep knowledge of UC treatment landscape, disease assessment methodologies, biologics, targeted therapeutics, remission definitions, and real-world prescribing patterns
- Track record constructing research instruments deployed in healthcare or life-science market research contexts
- Prior collaboration with pharmaceutical firms, medical affairs divisions, research consultancies, or healthcare insights groups is strongly preferred
- Availability for hourly contract work at 200 USD per hour on focused, well-scoped projects with templates and detailed input materials provided
Main skills
What the interview asks about
1.Translating research objectives into precise questions
Survey quality depends on your ability to interpret investigative intent and express it as answerable questions that yield meaningful data, requiring both clinical and research literacy.
For example: “You receive a research objective: 'Understand physician treatment decisions after first-line therapy failure.' What specific question structures would you use to capture this, and why would certain phrasings introduce bias?”
2.Integrating clinical accuracy into questionnaire design
Physicians completing surveys expect terminology, disease concepts, and medication classes to reflect current standards, so inaccuracy undermines respondent credibility and data integrity.
For example: “Your survey draft includes a question about 'remission indicators' but uses remission definitions from a 2015 guideline while current standards differ. How would you revise it, and what other sections might need updating?”
3.Designing logical skip patterns and branching
Effective skip logic maximizes relevant data collection while respecting respondent time, requiring you to anticipate which answers necessitate follow-up questions.
For example: “A physician indicates they prescribe biologics as first-line therapy, which contradicts typical practice patterns. Should this respondent see treatment sequencing questions designed for sequential therapy, and how would you structure the logic?”
4.Eliminating bias and leading language
Subtle wording choices influence how physicians interpret questions, so neutral phrasing is essential for obtaining authentic data rather than responses reflecting survey design expectations.
For example: “Your first draft asks, 'Which of these highly effective biologics have you prescribed?' Explain why this phrasing is problematic and how you would reframe it to gather unbiased prescribing data.”
5.Adhering to template structures and formatting
Client requirements specify exact format expectations because survey platforms and analysis workflows depend on consistent structure, so deviation compromises usability.
For example: “You've completed a survey draft but notice the provided template uses multi-part matrix questions while your draft uses separate single-item questions. Walk through your process for reconciling your clinical content with template constraints.”
How to prepare
- Review three published physician surveys in gastroenterology; identify their question formats, response scales, and logical structures
- Outline the current UC treatment landscape including drug classes, major therapeutics, sequencing patterns, and recent guideline changes relevant to physician decision-making
- Prepare a short written description of how physician prescribing for UC has evolved over your career and how those shifts reflect in treatment conversations and selection logic
The facts
- Pay
- $200/hr
- Hours
- Hourly, 40 hours a week
- Where
- Remote
- Posted
- 9/15/2026
We wrote this page from the public Mercor listing. It may be out of date, so read the full posting before you apply.