$40–80/hr · micro1
An aerospace or mechanical engineer who creates technical questions and answers about complex CAD assemblies to train AI systems.
What you would do
- Author objective, non-guessable questions about aerospace assemblies requiring exact technical knowledge
- Review native CAD files to understand part relationships, design intent, and functional requirements
- Develop multiple high-quality questions per assembly covering key features and component interactions
- Provide clear answers with specific references to model data and engineering principles
- Contribute to documentation and process feedback for improving future question sets
Who they want
- Strong background in aerospace, mechanical, or industrial design domains with proven CAD platform expertise
- Hands-on experience analyzing multi-part CAD assemblies and interpreting technical drawings
- Excellent written and verbal communication for conveying technical ideas clearly
- Familiarity with FreeCAD, SolidWorks, or similar CAD platforms (FreeCAD experience is valued)
- Experience writing rigorous technical questions with detailed answers, particularly in educational or professional contexts
Main skills
What the interview asks about
1.Assembly complexity navigation
Identifying what makes a question technically meaningful in a complex assembly requires understanding design intent and part dependencies.
For example: “A 47-part aerospace fuselage assembly in FreeCAD has nested subassemblies and constraints. Which 5-7 questions would test assembly understanding rather than just memorization?”
2.Technical precision in answers
Imprecise answers undermine AI training quality, so grounding answers in specific model geometry and behavior is essential to your deliverable.
For example: “You reference specific model geometry when writing answers about part positioning and constraints. How would you ensure answers are grounded in model data rather than general knowledge?”
3.Question objectivity
Ambiguous or guessable questions waste training data; your questions must require actual technical judgment to answer correctly.
For example: “You write a question about why a particular bracket is angled at 12 degrees in the assembly. How would you verify that the answer cannot be found by guessing or looking at other similar parts, and what reference data would you cite?”
4.CAD file reading
Extracting accurate technical facts from CAD requires knowing what to measure, which constraints matter, and how to verify your interpretations.
For example: “You write a question: 'Is this fastener pattern symmetric?' You see holes positioned identically on both sides but material thickness differs. How would you formulate a precise answer?”
5.Design intent interpretation
Parts are shaped and positioned for reasons; your questions should test whether someone understands function, not just appearance.
For example: “An engine mount assembly has reinforcement ribs in some areas but not others. What would you ask to determine whether a student knows the engineering reason for this variation rather than just seeing the geometry?”
6.Technical documentation standards
Questions and answers must meet professional standards for clarity, completeness, and defensibility in an educational or AI context.
For example: “You write 12 questions for an engine assembly. How would you verify coverage is uniform and an unfamiliar engineer could verify your answers are correct?”
A task you may get
Analyze a multi-part CAD assembly with 15-30 components and author 4-5 objective technical questions. For each, write the reference answer with specific model citations.
How to prepare
- Spend 2 hours examining a complex assembly in FreeCAD or your preferred CAD tool and documenting the part relationships, constraints, and design decisions
- Write 3 technical questions about a real assembly you know and test them on a colleague; refine them based on feedback on clarity and objectivity
- Review technical documentation or textbooks on assembly design to strengthen your ability to identify meaningful design features and constraints
- Identify one aerospace or mechanical assembly you designed or analyzed and articulate 5 distinct technical concepts someone should understand about it
The facts
- Pay
- $40–80/hr
- Open to
- Bangladesh, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United States, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia
- Field
- Other
- Role type
- Expert
- Posted
- 9/11/2026
- Places left
- 50
We wrote this page from the public micro1 listing. It may be out of date, so read the full posting before you apply.