Litigation Attorney (Shareholder / LLC)

What you would do

• Draft authentic litigation documents including motions, briefs, letters, and discovery materials for commercial shareholder and LLC disputes
• Create rubric items and scoring criteria that define what exemplary legal work looks like for each document type
• Revise drafts based on senior feedback while maintaining coherent case theory and strategic posture across related documents
• Identify and flag procedural gaps, factual ambiguities, and evidentiary weaknesses in multi-turn litigation scenarios
• Adapt to diverse document types and evolving project requirements under leadership direction

Who they want

• Licensed US attorney with bar admission in at least one US jurisdiction, active or lapsed
• Minimum 3+ years post-JD litigation experience involving substantive work in shareholder disputes, LLC governance, fiduciary claims, and operational issues
• Demonstrated mastery in legal drafting for discovery, motion practice, and strategic case development suitable for partner review
• Exceptional written communication with precision in legal argumentation and command of professional legal register
• Prior experience at litigation firms (BigLaw, boutique, mid-market); federal court or AI training background a plus

Main skills

What the interview asks about

1. 1.Maintaining case theory consistency

   Strong litigation requires coherent narrative across related documents. AI must learn to recognize when facts or arguments in one document contradict or undermine earlier positions.

   For example: “In turn one you filed a motion alleging shareholder oppression based on freeze-out pattern. In turn two, discovery weakens that pattern. How would you revise your turn-three brief to maintain credibility without abandoning core theory?”

2. 2.Drafting persuasive legal arguments

   Document quality depends on more than compliance with procedural rules; it requires building arguments that persuade while maintaining legal rigor. AI needs to see what distinguishes competent advocacy from excellent advocacy.

   For example: “Draft a brief opposing a shareholder buyout demand. Your opponent claims the price is fair under Delaware law. What structure would you use to attack the valuation methodology, and how would you anticipate their response?”

3. 3.Identifying fact gaps and ambiguities

   Litigation often stalls because critical facts are unclear. Attorneys must recognize which ambiguities help their case, which hurt it, and what discovery or stipulations might resolve them.

   For example: “You're drafting a motion in a dispute over voting rights, but the operating agreement uses ambiguous language on timing and procedures. You have limited facts about intent. How would you construct your argument, and what gaps would you flag to leadership?”

4. 4.Crafting evaluation rubrics

   Rubrics teach AI what excellence looks like in litigation. They must go beyond mechanics (proper formatting, proper citations) to capture what makes legal reasoning sound.

   For example: “Create a rubric for evaluating a demand letter in a shareholder oppression case. What criteria would you include for legal sufficiency, persuasiveness, and strategic positioning that would help an AI learn to assess letters?”

5. 5.Responding to feedback efficiently

   Senior feedback often involves shifting case theory or emphasis. Attorneys must understand why feedback matters and revise strategically without creating internal contradictions.

   For example: “A senior feedback suggests your motion over-emphasizes a technical argument and under-emphasizes fiduciary duty claims. You have limited space. How would you restructure to follow this feedback while maintaining your strongest arguments?”

A task you may get

Given a factual scenario involving a shareholder oppression claim in an LLC, draft a motion for relief and an accompanying rubric defining what makes the motion strong. Include how you would revise the motion if key facts changed.

How to prepare

• Locate one shareholder dispute case and analyze how plaintiff's motion and defendant's response differed in theory, emphasis, and strategy. Note what made one more persuasive.
• Review your background and identify 3-4 shareholder/LLC disputes you worked on. For each note what case theory held it together and how you adapted arguments.
• Practice drafting a brief responding to opposing counsel in an LLC governance dispute. Then create a rubric to distinguish your strong version from weaker alternatives.
• Study how Delaware courts handled key shareholder rights issues. Practice articulating case theory that explains how your facts fit or distinguish prior holdings.

The facts

Pay

$100/hr

Open to

Bangladesh, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United States, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia

Field

Law

Role type

Specialist

Posted

8/26/2026

Places left

1

We wrote this page from the public micro1 listing. It may be out of date, so read the full posting before you apply.